Who's Online
Invisible Members: 7 Visitors: 59
Past 7 Days
Song Uploads: 174
Song Votes: 326
Song Comments: 3444
Forum Posts: 832
New Members: 89
Participation Points: 12151.30
|
Get Flash to see this player.
Having playback trouble, try the Quicktime player:
  
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
|
|
|
|
|
Keywords:
love (945), marriage (16), infidelity (3), forgiveness (12), accoustic (103), folk (354), domestic (2)
|
|
Description:
This is my third song and the first in which I didn't try to pile as many effects as humanly possible onto my voice. It's about a couple deciding what to do after an affair.
I had a lot of trouble with hiss because I'm using the built-in mic and it's sensitive enough to pick up the sound of the computer's fan. I've put as much gate on the tracks as they will bear and used the AULowPass filter, but hiss is still an issue. I should have just let the hiss run throughout the song, rather than having it cut in and out, but by the time I figured this out, it was too late.
I hope you guys enjoy it and I reallly appreciate any input I get, both positive and critical.
Jim Bouchard posted a cover of this song, over here. I love it, so please check it out if you enjoyed this one. ;-)
After All, by Jim Bouchard
I'm lucky enough that Joe Gurner covered it too, with a very different arrangment than Jim's; Joe's is equally wonderful, though.
After All, by Joe Gurner
Lyrics:
After All
Newspapers piled by the front door,
this house isn't mine, not anymore.
I pick up your suitcase,
I put away my shoes.
After all, what is love for?
After all what is love for?
I'm not who you want me to,
but then again, neither is she.
If there's one thing
that I'm asking from you --
it's to be careful if you go.
I walk to the room where you're asleep.
Hearing you breathe
feels like something to keep.
I lift up the blankets
and lie down next to you.
After all what is love for?
After all what is love for?
I'm not who you want me to be,
but then again, neither is she.
If there's one thing
that I'm begging from you --
please don't go.
Please don't go.
Hardware:
eMac G4 700 mHZ, 640 RAM, internal mic
Software:
GarageBand
|
Your song is wonderful &mdash 06/09/05 - 04:15:54 PM
First off, I'm glad you don't have a lot of effects on your voice. You have a very pleasant voice. It's very pretty. The story you tell so good! The lyrics are very engaging. A story of a relationship that's a little sketchy on the edges. The 'she,' a third character in the realtionship. Is the owner of the suitcase cheating with her? The first person character is also 'not' who the suitcase person thinks she is. Everyone seems to be running a little scam. But the human 'don't go' line keeps the listener sympathising with the first person character. Very well done. The listener is left to ponder the out come. But fragile message: we all compromise, so not to be left alone. The house not hers anymore, another mystery.
If you did this with loops, it's a great job. I would have never known. Very nice ledebutant.
[ Reply to This ]
Your song is wonderful &mdash 06/09/05 - 05:12:24 PM
Thanks alley-oop, you're right about the song lyrics being sketchy, but I'm glad you like them that way. I had the impulse to write a narrative that explained every last detail of the story, but then thought it was better to leave it open (plus waaaaaay easier for me, Ms. Lazypants).
I see the song as being about a moment of choice. The husband is in bed, the wife is still awake and by picking up his suitcase and putting away her shoes, makes her decision that she will stay to try to work things out. She doesn't know what he will want to do, hence all the "please don't go," stuff. The reference to "this house isn't mine," is meant to refer to the disruption an affair causes in a household, that it changes the home and relationship.
I'm really impressed how well you got to the heart of what I was trying to do with the song when you said, "we all compromise, so not to be left alone."
I don't play any instruments, except the trombone, which is soooo not useful, so this is an all-loops song (heavily manipulated, of course). I wish I could play the guitar, but I'm not having much luck learning on my own. [ Reply to This ]
Your song is wonderful &mdash 06/09/05 - 08:07:09 PM
I think you misunderstood what I meant by sketchy. I think your lyrics are
excellent, seriously. The details, the stacked papers, putting things away,
lifting the blanket. As I listened, the house appeared, the rooms, the woman,
the sleeping man. The lyrics made the story come alive
I used the word sketchy in a slang context. Instead of saying a relationship
that's a little sketchy on the edges, I should say a relationship that's a little
frayed on the edges. My mistake, sorry.
Also, it was good song writing that led me to the heart of the song. Really
nice, Lisa, I'll be looking foward to hearing your next song! [ Reply to This ]
Your song is wonderful &mdash 06/09/05 - 09:09:34 PM
Oh gosh, alley-oop (and does that ever sound like cartoon dialogue..)
I did get what you meant, absolutely. I'm sorry if my response seemed defensive at all: I was indulging in my urge to explain everything rather than just letting it lie. I was actually really glad that you understood the song so well with just a little detail to go on. You really got it and that thrilled me.
[ Reply to This ]
Oblique is Good / Slow is Bad &mdash 06/09/05 - 05:32:23 PM
I think the vocal on this is nice and suits this kind of song -- melancholy lost-love song #7
This isn't a folk song, though. However I suppose if someone files Suzanne Vega under folk, then I could see that. I'm not sure what I mean by my having trouble with the genre. The lyrics work very well with the tone of the song (or the other way around) because they are both oblique and work so close to the trope of melancholy lost-love song, but the song, to my ears, just isn't specific enough in how it introduces elements and then takes possession of them. The generality of the detail, the tune, makes for a very accessible song and nice song. Folk in the way I think about folk doesn't really have these qualities except perhaps in the manufactured folk quality of someone like Nancy Griffith. Give me Geeshie Wallace or the Carter Family if you are going to go and call it folk.
The sound of the instrument stuck me as very natural if this was done with loops. There seemed a kind of texture/looseness that sounded like actual playing.
For my taste the song was way too slow even for melancholy lost-love song #7. [ Reply to This ]
Oblique is Good / Slow is Bad &mdash 06/09/05 - 05:51:42 PM
I absolutely agree with you that this song isn't Folk, but I couldn't handle the thought of putting it in "Soft Rock." I suppose I probably should have put it in"Pop" but I figured the same as you that if Suzanne Vega is "Folk," them maybe I could be, too. Don't say Nancy Griffith *lalalalalala I am not listening ****
It's weird about the song being slow, because I do know what you mean, but it's 120 bpm. I would usually have had three verses, but could tell that the song was getting long and when I finally did the mixdown, I was shocked to see that a two verse song was 3:48. I wish I could figure out how that happened, especially since I was using loops.
Thanks for the vote and the comments. They really help.
I think the vocal on this is nice and suits this kind of song -- melancholy lost-love song #7
This isn't a folk song, though. However I suppose if someone files Suzanne Vega under folk, then I could see that. I'm not sure what I mean by my having trouble with the genre. The lyrics work very well with the tone of the song (or the other way around) because they are both oblique and work so close to the trope of melancholy lost-love song, but the song, to my ears, just isn't specific enough in how it introduces elements and then takes possession of them. The generality of the detail, the tune, makes for a very accessible song and nice song. Folk in the way I think about folk doesn't really have these qualities except perhaps in the manufactured folk quality of someone like Nancy Griffith. Give me Geeshie Wallace or the Carter Family if you are going to go and call it folk.
The sound of the instrument stuck me as very natural if this was done with loops. There seemed a kind of texture/looseness that sounded like actual playing.
For my taste the song was way too slow even for melancholy lost-love song #7.
[ Reply to This [ Reply to This ]
lovely &mdash 06/09/05 - 06:34:42 PM
Lovely song. You sing this wonderfully. Sincere lyrics,
flows nicely, warm, intimate sound. I totally agree about
just letting the unfortunate hiss sound stay constant
rather than hear it cutting in and out. On soft songs like
this it's very hard to cover up line/room noise. Actually,
other than the additional hiss the built in mic captured
your voice pretty well. As I think you figured out
afterwards, cutting noise in and out actually draws more
attention to it than just leaving it does.
Really a nice song and performance. I hope you can get a
good mic for future recordings. [ Reply to This ]
lovely &mdash 06/09/05 - 06:56:26 PM
Thanks Pgree. I do have an external mic (a Sony F-V-100) and need to get a pre-amp, but I have no idea what to buy. As with all of this, I'll figure it out as I go along.
You're right about the mic picking up everything. Right before I posted today, I realized you can hear my dog's tags jingling in the background. [ Reply to This ]
This is very good &mdash 06/09/05 - 09:21:29 PM
...and if you ever want to collaborate with a guitar player,
give me a shout. This reminded me of Hem a little bit.
Very well done!
I use a Tascam US-122 as my interface. It has midi as well
as mic inputs, very good mic preamps and is a fairly good
value in terms of quality for the money as these things go.
When you are trying to do things as delicate as this, it is
noticible when you have some line noise, so it might be
worth it for you. Your songs certainly are good enough to
warrant it if this one is any indication!
I like the dog tags! I kept hoping for a trombone solo! [ Reply to This ]
This is very good &mdash 06/09/05 - 10:00:07 PM
You keep hoping for a trombone solo? So does my mother. She never let me get over quitting trombone in the eighth grade because it and my book bag were too freaking heavy to carry two miles to school and two miles back every day. I only took it up to be cussed because everyone said I looked like a flute player. I knew I couldn't heft a tuba, so I took the next best thing.
I would LOVE to try to collaborate with you, but admit that I might suffer performance anxiety. When I say that "After All" is my third song, that's really what I mean. This is the third song I have ever written, and only the second with words, so I'm worried that I won't be able to perform consistently at this point, but I hope you'd be willing to try, given all those caveats. I think your songs are really cool and I know I could learn a lot from you.
I don't know Hem, I'll have to do a google.
Strangely, enough, I was posting over on your Dwell page, as you were over here. I really meant what I said about your brothers.
Thanks for the tips on the Tascam US-122. I thought your production was wonderful on Dwell, so I believe you that it's a great piece of gear and I'll try to track one down.
Thanks, Jim! [ Reply to This ]
Nice cut &mdash 06/10/05 - 12:37:11 AM
This is the kind of song I always liked to hear on a good
rock album, at the very end. Something that really takes
an overall body of work to another, much cooler place.
And really have the listener going, whoa, nice stuff, why
don't they do more of that.
This is really good, even with line hiss. I think if you follow
Mr. Bouchard's suggestions, it'll take you to a pretty darn
good place. You've got a good voice ? read that as apply
few effects if any because it's really nice ? and I liked the
harmony parts a lot. Also, maybe just me, the line hiss
seemed to fade when you brought in the strings.
Really liked the lyrics. Been in that personal place, and the
words captured very well that spirit of committing to
something totally uncommitted and on the verges tearing
apart. The questions are as much directed at the singer as
the person she's singing about. I liked that.
For loops, amazing. You worked them very well.
Folk rock? I'll leave that up to others to decide. What it
reminded me of was a group called The Samples in
structure, words and your type of singing. Of course, they
have a male lead, so that's totally irrelevant. I couldn't
begin to tell you what genre they're in, but I know I like
them.
Keep up with this. Third song ever? Freakin' awesome. [ Reply to This ]
Nice cut &mdash 06/10/05 - 01:31:15 PM
Thanks, Zendog,
I'm really excited that you liked the song and thought it was cool. I checked out The Samples and liked them very much. I'm a sucker for a guitar. You're right about the hiss fading out when the string come in. I think they just drown out the frequency a bit. [ Reply to This ]
Very Good Song &mdash 06/10/05 - 06:46:04 AM
Also good arrangement. Your singing is very good.
I agree with advice about mic and noise and I look forward
to hearing more. It'd be cool to hear you and Jim Bouchard
collaborate. [ Reply to This ]
Very Good Song &mdash 06/10/05 - 01:34:34 PM
Thanks so much, Mungo. I really want to add that I'm grateful that you have taken the time to comment on one of my songs again. You're an astute listener and it's very generous of you to take the time to write down your thoughts. [ Reply to This ]
wow! &mdash 06/10/05 - 08:21:43 AM
I suspected you had some talent when I heard your first post, but nothing as wonderful as this.
wow is all I can say. I don't mind the hiss, the singing distracts me.
Beautifully sung and produced!
BRAVO!!
DL/8s! [ Reply to This ]
wow! &mdash 06/10/05 - 01:40:22 PM
Hey, it's Kev. So nice to see you again, you're so supportive and I appreciate it. Thank you very much for the compliment; I think there's an element of beginner's luck with this song, but I feel so grateful that people here are responding well to my song. Thank you for the download and the 8's!
[ Reply to This ]
One of those recordings.... &mdash 06/10/05 - 11:35:11 AM
where lyrics, music, and vocals all blend to create
the mood and feel that matches the content theme of
the song. Just want to say what a fine piece of
song writing this is and I really enjoyed listening to
you sing and perform it.
Jack [ Reply to This ]
One of those recordings.... &mdash 06/10/05 - 01:46:59 PM
Thanks, Jack. This song came together really quickly and the loops dictated the subject matter. It just sounded like a sad song. I'm not sophisticated enough at this point to think, "I'd like to write a song about X." and then be able to put that together.
I'm glad you liked it. [ Reply to This ]
gad, wow what words &mdash 06/10/05 - 11:46:54 AM
This is a real heart grabber of a tune.
And you do double duty very well with the nice backup
music!
Just terrific
Sorry, I have not heard much of your music, but I will be on
the lookout for them to to reach the higher echelons of the
weekly picks. [ Reply to This ]
gad, wow what words &mdash 06/10/05 - 01:51:10 PM
thetiler, I'm really glad the words grabbed your heart. Don't be sorry you haven't heard much of my music, there isn't much yet. :-) [ Reply to This ]
great voice &mdash 06/10/05 - 03:08:34 PM
great voice &mdash 06/11/05 - 10:16:30 PM
johnfloy, thanks so much for the compliment on my voice. I especially like it that you used "caveman talk" to express yourself. Me like your comment. [ Reply to This ]
A really lovely track &mdash 06/10/05 - 06:04:32 PM
This is very nice..great vocals, instrumentation,
production. The subtle background orchestration is really
effective. Thanks for sharing this
S [ Reply to This ]
A really lovely track &mdash 06/10/05 - 06:06:17 PM
This is very nice..great vocals, instrumentation,
production. The subtle background orchestration is really
effective. Thanks for sharing this
S [ Reply to This ]
A really lovely track &mdash 06/11/05 - 10:19:34 PM
Thanks, stevel. I like the orchestration, too, enough that I want to get my hands on JamPack 4 as quickly as I can. [ Reply to This ]
striking voice &mdash 06/11/05 - 11:53:48 AM
As someone who's like 'folk' since I learned Mary Hamilton
from off my mother, this is folk if it wants to be.
I think folk is any music of and by the people, often
speaking of their concerns, or topical issues of the times.
I suppose folk has also been played on particular
instruments that were to hand. Well, what was a lute a few
hundred years ago could be an ibook today.
Maybe the genre on macjams should be renamed 'roots
music' if people want only dustbowl/celtic/medieval/
'world music' sounds. [ Reply to This ]
Aw heck... &mdash 06/11/05 - 08:47:17 PM
...I was retail manager of an acoustic music shop for years
during the 80's, and played in an acoustic band for, what,
fourteen years or something, and I have to say that it
causes me to marvel that people spend such time when a
song comes around on WHAT TO CALL IT...
Because, really, this COULD be in the realm of rock a la
Suzanne Vega, or folk a la some of The Roches, or it could
be rock a la Mo Tucker of the Velvets doing "After Hours",
with that unexpectedly fragile, yearning, optimistic voice...
...or it could be...anything...
I could go on. I won't.
This is a lovely, yearning tune. The vocal suits it to a T. I
like it very much. It's got some "good ambiguity" to it.
Off to download. Many thanks. [ Reply to This ]
Aw heck... &mdash 06/11/05 - 10:25:56 PM
eltopo and ejh, thanks for defending the idea that this could be folk. I'm really glad they added the "Folk Rock" category after I posted this so I could switch it over, but you're right that folk is of the people, made with whatever's at hand and labeling something folk doesn't change the song itself. I could have called this Cowboy Techno and it would still be the same song.
I'm trying to get around and listen to everyone's songs and return the favor of commenting and voting, it will just take me a little while, but I want everyone to know how grateful I am for your support and input. [ Reply to This ]
I just &mdash 06/11/05 - 11:24:20 PM
I just &mdash 06/12/05 - 11:52:38 AM
Very sweet &mdash 06/12/05 - 01:23:02 PM
You have a lovely voice, and it works great with these
lyrics.
Some nits about the arrangement. (After remarking that
the guitar part and the strings sound just fine.)
You have a high percussion instrument (a triangle or
finger cymbal) that comes in with the bass. It's too soft.
That sort of touches can really make a song. Make a
conscious decision where to use it, where not, and the
play it loud and clear. Well, clear.
When the bass comes in, it feels like the overall level goes
down a bit. An overenthousiastic compressor?
But that's just nitpicking. [ Reply to This ]
Very sweet &mdash 06/12/05 - 09:25:43 PM
Thanks, TenneseeVic, I appreciate you taking the time to comment on one of my songs again. It's really nice of you.
Thanks for the nitpicking, I'm such a novice, that no nit is too small to pick, as I can really benefit from the more experienced musicians here. I had played with the volume on the triangle, which later turns into cymbal, but was afraid of overdoing it, so I backed off. When I get a decent pre-amp and re-record the vocals, I will post a new version with a jacked up triangle (ooh, hard-core).
I've tried to hear what you said about the overall level going down when the bass comes in, but I can't hear it. The bass track doesn't have any compression on it and the master track is about 30-35% compressed. I'm wondering if the bass helps drown out the hiss even more and that's what makes it sound different. I welcome any more feedback on this, but I'm not sure how to proceed at this point.
Thanks again! [ Reply to This ]
Very sweet &mdash 06/19/05 - 07:52:02 PM
Hm. I thought I just posted a comment.....
Anyway, the volume going down is an aural illusion. When the bass comes in,
you switch to a different guitar riff, one that is in a lower register.
So it's no problem.
---
Victor -- I review yours, you review mine, 'kay? [ Reply to This ]
What a brilliantly constructed song... &mdash 06/14/05 - 06:53:18 AM
... about splitting up with someone you are still in love
with. Myself I wouldn't mess with it much more.
Beautiful, sad-subdued singing; excellent arrangements.
It could be better recorded, sure, but what's so perfect
about this is the way it's so self-contained. It sounds like
an internal world being described - the voices inside a sad
head. It's like you're carefully holding things together in
case they all fall apart. Beautiful. [ Reply to This ]
What a brilliantly constructed song... &mdash 06/14/05 - 03:52:13 PM
Thank you so much, mandolinquent for stopping by. It gave me a little thrill because I'm a big, gigantoid fan of your work, especially the colloborations with Rebsie. I don't think I will mess around with this song too much more, except for increasing the volume on the triangle/cymbal and re-recording the vocal when I get a pre-amp, but I'm afraid to do anything else because there was a lot of luck involved in this song. [ Reply to This ]
Vaguely Vega? &mdash 06/15/05 - 08:18:29 AM
Vaguely Vega? &mdash 06/15/05 - 11:23:42 AM
I'm a big fan of Suzanne Vega's first album, so I suppose the influence may have crept in. Of course, she's so much better than me, so I won't delude myself, but I guess this might be reminiscent in sound of "Small Blue Thing".
So yes, vaguely Vega, unless you meant the car, in which case, no. :-) [ Reply to This ]
Wow... &mdash 06/15/05 - 12:19:07 PM
Incredible lyrics, great song structure. This is a great piece of music and I could see it selling well...
Fantastic singer, by the way. Really wonderful! This was recorded using the internal microphone? I'm blown away! [ Reply to This ]
Wow... &mdash 06/15/05 - 04:26:23 PM
Thanks so much for the compliments. I know what you mean about the internal mic, I still can't get over how well it works. Those Apple people make amazing products. [ Reply to This ]
Lovely &mdash 06/16/05 - 05:43:15 AM
This is great. I love the harmonies you've done. I am totally blown away that you did this without a keyboard or a dedicated mic. Brilliant. [ Reply to This ]
Lovely &mdash 06/23/05 - 09:40:22 PM
Thanks myshkin. I didn't know what on earth I was doing with the harmonies and just completely faked it. It could easily have gone very, very wrong. [ Reply to This ]
GREAT SONG &mdash 06/16/05 - 09:30:15 AM
I love this song! Your voice sounds really cute! I would lie in the bed so you could lift the blankets and write another song with the flashlight and some smores! I'll meet you at the fire pit tonight! beneath the old oak tree! Jargubbily slanikan! [ Reply to This ]
GREAT SONG &mdash 06/23/05 - 09:43:32 PM
How do we know if my voice is cute or if it just sounds cute? This is the question that keeps me awake at night.
Kumbayah, bizzare, kumbayah. [ Reply to This ]
CUTE VOICE! &mdash 06/26/05 - 03:46:04 PM
It is cute! When the sound waves come out they paint a pictur of a
Brazilian poooky puppy! Very nice picture your are painting with the
voice! Twinkie anyone? Stop tickling me! [ Reply to This ]
very pleasant &mdash 06/16/05 - 01:25:41 PM
I enjoyed listening to this song very much. Your voice has
a nice silvery, light quality which is very pleasing to the
ear.
Your string accompaniment is well done. What sounds did
you use? (since you mentioned NOT having JP4 yet....do
get it soon, it's great!) The cello sound was just slightly
muddy through my headphones, but overall, it was very
good.
Nice pacing of vocal interweaving with instrumental
layers, varied well.
Good lyrics, simple and heartfelt. [ Reply to This ]
very pleasant &mdash 06/23/05 - 09:47:13 PM
Thanks for the nice comments and the recommendation of JP4. Having heard your fanfare, I really, really want it now.
I used a portion of a 70's Ballad Piano Loop with many of the notes removed and plopped it into Orchestral Strings. Removing a few more notes, might help clean up the muddiness. I think you're right about it.
[ Reply to This ]
Yum! &mdash 06/19/05 - 10:16:07 AM
Please, please, please change your bio picture - my heart
pangs every time I look at it!
Very nice song. But the picture, the picture. You're going
to have to shave your hair off, like Sinead did, so that we
can all concentrate on the music!!
;O) [ Reply to This ]
Yum! &mdash 06/27/05 - 10:20:30 PM
Hmm. I was worried that the current photo already made me look bald, possibly because I have lots and lots of hair, so I'm used to seeing that. I promise to dress as The Unknown Comic next time I take a picture; I'd hate to throw anyone off the music. :) [ Reply to This ]
This song shows you off as a composer and singer &mdash 06/20/05 - 07:49:55 PM
This is what happens &mdash 06/23/05 - 04:07:32 PM
when you go on vacation: you miss a fine song like this
one.
Just now getting around to this. I was gone when you
posted it. Very powerful piece. Actually made me ache.
Excellent. I look forward to more.
9-7-8-8
[ Reply to This ]
I really like this &mdash 06/24/05 - 04:37:43 PM
You've got a lovely voice and have put together an
excellent song here. Very enjoyable indeed.
Line hiss used to be the bane of my life, so I sympathise.
But in all honesty, with a song as good as this the
technical faults don't matter much. [ Reply to This ]
Thanks, guys &mdash 06/27/05 - 10:23:00 PM
Thanks illuminati, Rebsie and Tom, as you know I enjoy all of your music and it's so nice that you liked my song. Thank you so much for taking the time to leave a comment. [ Reply to This ]
Wow, you've made rapid progress &mdash 06/25/05 - 01:18:50 PM
Listening through the 3 tunes you've posted so far, I've heard
a world of progress. I'm really glad you're loosening up and
getting comfortable with vocals, this is much stronger than
"In the Garden" vocally (though I love that one lyrically, I'd
like to hear you take another stab at it performance-wise
after hearing this. Very nice, good use of the loops - it might
be nice to open this up to a collab and have some folks put
in some "real" parts here and there (I would love to hear
some gentle 12 string rhythm guitar strumming behind the
builds). Please keep developing, I think you're on a really
good path. [ Reply to This ]
Wow, you've made rapid progress &mdash 06/27/05 - 10:41:42 PM
Thanks so much, ka-klick, for saying you hear progress. I certainly hope I can improve with time, but I am truly a beginner, so the going may be slow. There's definitely going to be some going backwards and then forwards. With each song, I learn a little something new. The next song I plan to post is just a silly thing, but it was a try at having an electric guitar in a song.
The vocals are always the hardest part for me. My best friend growing up had a five and a half octave range and, of course, was lauded for her absolutely gorgeous voice. I didn't dare open my mouth. I do plan to take another stab at In the Garden, but I'm waiting to get a better mic set-up before I re-record anything. I think I was oversinging during In the Garden and learned from After All that I'll probably do better to just relax when I sing and try not to worry about sounding perfect.
I am ALWAYS open to collaboration and if anyone ever wanted to add "real" or otherwise parts to any of my songs, I would kiss the ground he or she walked on. If anyone is interested, just email me and I'll send you whatever you need.
Thanks again, ka-klick. [ Reply to This ]
good song! &mdash 07/01/05 - 12:26:01 PM
wonderful song. i hope you can work out the hiss issues and everything. i am now going to check out your other stuff! [ Reply to This ]
I really &mdash 07/02/05 - 09:42:02 AM
Fantastic Voice! &mdash 07/03/05 - 10:48:28 AM
| |
If you did this with loops, it's a great job. I would have never known. Very nice ledebutant.
[ Reply to This ]