This is very evocative. I am drawn to a place far away from my inner
city neighborhood in Midwestern United States. The ambience is
dreamy. The voice is supple and suppliant. All I would suggest is not
applying that tremolo effect to your voice. Ever since I heard Cher do it,
I don't like it. Do not be afraid to use your real voice. It is pure and
well-contoured.

Welcome to MacJams. I look forward to hearing more of your music.
Malaysia and Minnesota on the same page!

[ Reply to This ]

I love the overall sound of the music, gorgeous melody/harmony, nice
orchestration... I really like the lyrics, and your singing voice sounds
very pretty, but I agree with Richard, that the pitch-tweaking actually
detracts from the beauty of the piece. It seems like a cheap gimmick.
I think if you kept the other vocal effects in there, and removed the
pitch-warble, this would be awesome!

This sounds a little like some of the later ELO stuff. Very nice! I look
forward to more from you!

ttfn,
Drakonis

[ Reply to This ]

Smooth and, as you say, lovely. Love the lush synth bed and the different
layered vocals. You do have a great voice and I agree with Rich and Drak
in that you should back off on the effects, at least on the lead. There are
some of the backing vocals where it sounds just fine. But, it's not enough
to keep me from really enjoying (and downloading) the tune. Definitely
gonna check out the rest of your stuff.

[ Reply to This ]

that singin, nice cher-vocal feel, nice tune!

[ Reply to This ]

So nice, full of emotive washes, layers of mind voices caught in a moment
you don't trust yet so want to be lasting. Hands touching, breathing each
other's breath, the world falling all around until all there is is the two of
you. Mesmerizing and magnetic. I'd love to hear it without the pitch
trick, just to give it a more human context, but the inter-deimentional
feel of this arrangement has its own hard to hold aspect that works
perfectly with the concept, in my mind. As if you don't even trust your
own conscience as it speaks...

[ Reply to This ]