In fact, the imperfections you mention were caught at the rehearsal. I have
another recording of the latter half of the piece recorded immediately after
this which (except for a spectacularly botched ending which left everyone
laughing hysterically) is a better performance than this. But I thought that
splicing the two performances together would be both too much work for my
purposes and would work against the purity of the performance. They didn't
have enough time in the rehearsal to completely reperform the piece.
About the Marantz: I agonized about getting one. There are several other
digital two-tracks which look "just as good," spec-wise. And some are a lot
smaller and cheeper. The Marantz PMD660 looks just like an old Star Trek
tricorder. Twice the size and $100 more is not usually a selling point in a
technological device. I finally went with it because it's a Marantz and they
have a reputation of lasting forever and it's the only device in its class with
true XLR inputs. The built-in mic isn't too bad too, but I'd be hesitant to use it
for anything but spoken (it's a bit thin for music).
[ Reply to This ]
Thanks for sharing this.
I'm curious - how far away was the mic from the chorus?
[ Reply to This ]