Home Community Music Blog Old MJ More...      
Come Bach TuMi by Magritte [Email]
Genre: Ambient

Get Flash to see this player.


Having playback trouble, try the Quicktime player:

Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial

SONG STATS:
Hits: 1906
Comments: 25
Votes:
Plays: 349
Last Played: Nov 19, 2008 - 09:46:28 PM
Downloads: 82
Fans: 5
Uploaded: Apr 05, 2005 - 08:54:23 PM
Last Updated: Mar 19, 2007 - 01:12:05 PM



Description:
The concept is sort of like four futuristic machines that get into an argument/discussion about Bach. About 3/4 of the way through there's kind of a technological "flashback"...if you get that far.

(I had no idea what genre to put this in...this one seems closer than classical but I'm open to suggestions.)

The only loops are TuMi. (There are some spacey sounds added to them.) Every bit of the fugue was recorded by me, I used nothing from the Web -- no MIDIs or anything -- except for some public domain sheet music.

Lyrics:
Dum dum dummmm...dum dum dum dum dum dum dum dummmm....

Hardware:
iMac G5, M-Audio Keystation 49e, tired eyes and fingers

Software:
GarageBand 2, TuMi loops, Jam Packs 1 and 4
You must be registered and logged-in to comment.

Got real interesting indeed &mdash 04/05/05 - 09:51:21 PM
Like that bach sound 1/4th into middle.

Very cool, nice duet there.

That is the nicest classical influence I heard tonight. Wow,
nice organ. Yes!
Then the nice bass and drums, cool.
Even the cool thump of the bass drum or something.
Nice ending. Good going!!


[ Reply to This ]
Fantastic! &mdash 04/06/05 - 12:13:28 AM
good stuff here, takes the imagination on a ride

[ Reply to This ]
Loved it. &mdash 04/06/05 - 08:14:36 AM
Loved it.
Loved the idea, loved the mix.

[ Reply to This ]
Thanks much!... &mdash 04/06/05 - 10:40:57 PM
...to you, Tom Wounded, and thetiler for your kind comments. I figured when making this that it probably had kind of a limited audience, so I'm glad you guys enjoyed it.

[ Reply to This ]
Midi hey? 22htz hey...? &mdash 04/06/05 - 09:56:12 PM
your song sounds like your trying to be bach and failing
miserably. It meanders all over the place and leads no
where. there is no structure or depth you should think
long and hard when judging others about sound quality
when your song doesn't even have content!!?

[ Reply to This ]
Um...what? &mdash 04/06/05 - 10:33:18 PM
This is the Little Fugue in g by Johann Sebastian Bach -- one of his best-known works -- in its entirety. I did not alter a thing except to change the octave of one single note that didn't work in the correct octave for the instrument in question. If you have issues with the arrangement, the fault is certainly mine, although your comments were hardly constructive. However, whatever problems you have with the depth and structure of the fugue, you may argue about with centuries of music lovers and Bach's own reputation as a composer of reasonable quality.


[ Reply to This ]
Ah, I see. &mdash 04/06/05 - 10:43:23 PM
You are attacking me, Magritte, because of a comment someone else posted about your song. In the future you might want to avoid such mistakes. (I would also suggest avoiding such comments, but it's your own decision how you want to be viewed around here.)

[ Reply to This ]
Ah, I see. &mdash 04/06/05 - 11:18:38 PM
a misunderstanding on my part, and i appologise for that but the fact that
you addmitted to using an entire score of bach and altering one note then
calling it your own makes me very sad. i with draw my sound snob coment
but the rest stands.

[ Reply to This ]
Hmm. &mdash 04/06/05 - 11:39:00 PM
I said the fugue was *recorded* by me, and that I used sheet music. I thought that, plus the name, plus the fact that the piece is VERY well known, would all serve as enough information that the fugue was not composed by me. There are plenty of transcriptions of famous pieces around here...and I'm sure this one isn't my last.

However, I also apologize if I somehow misled anyone else into thinking that I composed, rather than transcribed, this piece.

[ Reply to This ]
Ahhh Bach &mdash 04/07/05 - 03:28:05 AM
Sorry, I was having a MASH episode flashback
Nice W Carlos type arrangement here.

[ Reply to This ]
Ha! &mdash 04/07/05 - 11:38:20 AM
I swear every time I opened this up to work on it I thought "Ahh...Bach." Glad you liked the tune.

[ Reply to This ]
Hmmm &mdash 04/07/05 - 12:58:47 PM
It took me a second listen to be certain, but I really liked
this version. Sounds simple enough, but there a
originalities in there that really make it stand out. I
especially like the transition to a real organ, very nice.

Liked it so much, I downloaded it! Good work!

[ Reply to This ]
Hmmm &mdash 04/09/05 - 01:54:55 PM
Thanks, I was on the fence about the organ but figured the piece was weird enough, a little more weird wouldn't hurt. Thanks for posting, especially because I've listened to some great stuff on your favorites list!

[ Reply to This ]
nicely done &mdash 04/07/05 - 08:36:58 PM
i really like your interpretation. the production &
performance are excellent. an especially great job at
creating the soundscape-lots of movement & working the
left/right channels. if you've never heard it, you should
check out william ørbit's 'pieces in a modern style'..
similar concept

[ Reply to This ]
nicely done &mdash 04/09/05 - 01:56:42 PM
I downloaded "Cavalleria Rusticana" based on your recommendation and thought it was lovely. Thanks for the comment and suggestion.

[ Reply to This ]
you futured my favorite fugue! &mdash 04/09/05 - 12:23:18 PM
I have often gotten this particularly catchy melody stuck in
my head for weeks at a time, I've loved this particular
piece by Bach for decades... I've also been a long-time
Walter/Wendy Carlos Moog synthesizer nut, of which this
sounds somewhat derivative, but in a good way. So with
that as background... I love it! Nice use of electronic
background leadup and loops & sound effects. You did a
good job of blending the loops, and fading different
voices in & out... the church organ's arrival for a sweetly
short period near the end was apropos, poignant and
slightly comedic, and was a very nice sounding organ too.
If it were me, I would have had a very faint foreshadowing
of he organ waft in at about 1/3 of the way in, and get
stamped out again by the Moogles?Ѣ, only to show up in
full again near the end as you did. And one last thing...
did you really play that from sheet music on your KB?
Even if you recorded one voice at a time, I'm very
impressed with your playing skills... Bach is
extraordinarily precise, and you captured the
mathematical precision of the fugue beautifully. I think
that part of the fun of your scoring is the modern
backbeat-style percussion loops you used set against the
metronome-consistency of the melody. Your melting
together of old and new styles was done very nicely.
Brava!
ttfn,
Drakonis


[ Reply to This ]
you futured my favorite fugue! &mdash 04/09/05 - 02:02:30 PM
Wow...thanks for the kind comments. I really like the idea about "foreshadowing" the organ; if I ever revisit this piece I will give that a try.

And yeah, I did record the whole thing, and it was definitely voice by voice (occasionally measure by measure; my keyboard skills have really deteriorated). One of the advantages of intending the piece to be mechanical is I could go in and edit everything without trying to maintain a lot of expression. I'm definitely not ready to try an "acoustic" version yet!

[ Reply to This ]
Awesome! &mdash 04/12/05 - 12:38:38 PM
I don't really care if you used midi, played it by yourself,
lower or raised one octave when needed to - the result,
and outcome is very good. Bach was a good composer
and this stands as a very good tribute to his memory. I
like how you "sneak" in the TUMI loops without distorting
the essance of the orginal. Great work!

[ Reply to This ]
Awesome! &mdash 04/17/05 - 02:55:02 AM
Heh, I was going for kind of a "sneak" with the loops. Didn't really know what to do with them. Thanks!

[ Reply to This ]
Fugues, eh? &mdash 04/16/05 - 11:24:13 PM
Fugues are so hard to make them sound transparent.
Anachronistic though they may be, pianos are often your
best bet. String quartets work too.

However, I've on occasion tried playing fugues
electronically and always failed. And I'm sorry to say that
your piece -- fun though it is -- suffers from the same
defects that I keep running into: electronic sounds are just
too rich. I take it this is a 4-voice fugue? Most of the time
I can hear a voice and a half, so to speak. It is hard to
make out more than two lines.

But high marks for trying!


[ Reply to This ]
Fugues, eh? &mdash 04/17/05 - 02:59:26 AM
Yes, if I had taken more time with this piece I should have done more with bringing the voices in and out to distinguish them a little better. Basically I was lazy because a) I was REALLY tired of working on it after recording the whole fugue and b) I was hoping the familiarity of the piece would help.

I was actually thinking about reworking it, now that I have the fugure recorded, with acoustic sounds like strings, but I don't know if it would turn out too well since there isn't a lot of expression in the recording. I was in fact looking over some of Bach's two-part inventions (much less complex) to play with next for the exact reasons you mention.

Thanks for listening and commenting!

[ Reply to This ]
Rock on..... &mdash 04/25/05 - 12:14:56 PM
Way to go Mag!


I like how you put yer Twist on things.

Really Cool.

:)

Cheers!

[ Reply to This ]
Very cool &mdash 05/28/05 - 01:06:33 AM
I'm still not a fan of the drums but they fit better here.
Very retro-futuristic... gives me a Logan's Run flashback.

I wish I could play keys as well as you do.


Do you have a version without the drums???

[ Reply to This ]
Very cool &mdash 05/28/05 - 01:53:02 PM
Thanks elppa...yeah, I'm not crazy about the drums either but it's what TuMi gave us to work with so there they are. I don't have another version of this because I made it for the contest but I guess anything's possible in the future. Thanks for commenting!

[ Reply to This ]
O, Bach's Hair &mdash 06/11/07 - 09:46:43 AM
I can't say that I'm a Bach expert or even a fan, for that matter. (I'm a bit of a jazz snob.) But the layering in this interpretation is nothing short of professional. Actually, what you did with the percussion is what impressed me the most. Too often, folks will have a great idea and then turn around and put that great idea on a boring drum pattern that has no variation or dynamic. This is not the case with this song. Your choices with that instrument really make the scales and arpeggios of the other instruments stand out more, thus resulting in a more colorful piece. Great work here and it's clear that you have a command of this style of music.

[ Reply to This ]
Copyright 2008 Simig Media, Inc.